Native Food Uses of Common Milkweed (Asclepias syriaca)
Abstract
Common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) is used as a food by numerous North American Indigenous groups, yet also considered a poisonous plant by chemists and others. The details of traditional, Indigenous preparation methods, which render it as an edible and culturally important food choice, are reported here, along with harvesting and tending methods. The specifics of these interactions between Indigenous groups and common milkweed not only allow consumption of this “poisonous” plant, but also appear to sustain the vigor of the species, making these details important for conservation of this traditional food.
References
Anderson, M. K. 2013. Tending the Wild. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Bhowmik, P. C., and J. D. Bandeen. 1976. The biology of Canadian weeds. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 56:579-589.
Buechel, E. 1983. A Dictionary of Teton Sioux Lakota-English: English--Lakota. Red Cloud Indian School, Pine Ridge, South Dakota.
Burrows, G. E. and R. J. Tyrl. 2013. Toxic Plants of North America. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Castetter, E. E. 1935. Uncultivated Native Plants Used as Sources of Food. University of New Mexico Ethnobiological Studies 4: (vol. 1), Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Cheatham, S., and M. C. Johnston. 2000. The Useful Wild Plants of Texas, the Southeastern and Southwestern United States, the Southern Plains and Northern Mexico. Useful Wild Plants Inc., Austin, Texas.
Densmore, F. 1928. Uses of Plants by the Chippewa Indians. Forty-Fourth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1926-27, edited by J. W. Fewkes, pp. 275-397. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C.
Everest, M. A., M. P. Gonella, H. G. Bowler, J. R. Washak, and J. R. 2019. How Toxic Is Milkweed When Harvested and Cooked According to Myaamia Tradition? Ethnobiology Letters 10:50-56.
Evetts, L. L., and O. C. Burnside. 1975. Effect of early competition on growth of common milkweed. Weed Science 23:1-3.
Fletcher, A. C., and F. La Flesche. 1911. The Omaha Tribe. In Twenty-Seventh Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1905-1906, edited by W. H. Holmes, pp. 15-654. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Gaertner, E. E. 1979. The History and Use of Milkweed (Asclepias syriaca L.). Economic Botany 33:119-123.
Gilmore, M. R. 1913. Some Native Nebraska Plants with Their Uses by the Dakota. Collections of the Nebraska State Historical Society 17:363.
Gilmore, M. R. 1977. Uses of Plants by the Indians of the Missouri River Region. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
Gonella, M. P. 2007. Myaamia Ethnobotany. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Botany, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio. Available on request from gonella@sbcc.edu.
Kaul, R. B., S. B. Rolfsmeier, and J. J. Esch. 1991. The Distribution and Reproductive Phenology of the Milkweeds (Asclepiadaceae: Asclepias and Cynanchum) in Nebraska. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences XVIII:1267-140.
Kindscher, K.1987. Edible Wild Plants of the Prairie: An Ethnobotanical Guide. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.
Kindscher, K. 2023. Edible Wild Plants of the Prairie: An Ethnobotanical Guide. 2nd edition. Manuscript submitted to University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.
Kindscher, K., L. Yellow Bird, M. Yellow Bird, and L. Sutton. 2020. Sahnish (Arikara) Ethnobotany. Contributions in Ethnobiology, Tacoma, WA.
Matthews, J. J. 1961. The Osages, Children of the Middle Waters. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, Oklahoma.
McCauley, D. E. 1991. The Effect of Host Plant Patch Size Variation on the Population Structure of a Specialist Herbivore Insect, Tetraopes tetraophthalmus. Evolution 45:1675-1684.
Parker, A. C. 1910. Iroquois Uses of Maize and Other Food Plants. University of the State of New York, Albany.
Price, P. W., and M. F. Willson. 1979. Abundance of Herbivores on Six Milkweed Species in Illinois. The American Midland Naturalist 101:76-86.
Rogers, D. J. 1980. Lakota Names and Traditional Uses of Native Plants by Sicangu (Brule) People in the Rosebud Area, South Dakota. St. Francis Mission, Rosebud, South Dakota.
Smith, H. H. 1928. Ethnobotany of the Meskwaki Indians. Bulletin of the Public Museum of the City of Milwaukee 4:175-326.
Smith, H. H. 1933. Ethnobotany of the Forest Potawatomi Indians. Bulletin of the Public Museum of Milwaukee 7:1-230.
Copyright (c) 2024 Michael P. Gonella, Kelly Kindscher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content and grant Ethnobiology Letters (the “Journal”) and the Society of Ethnobiology right of first publication. Authors and the Journal agree that Ethnobiology Letters will publish the article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to use, distribute, and reproduce the work non-commercially, provided the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
For any reuse or redistribution of a work, users must make clear the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
In publishing with Ethnobiology Letters corresponding authors certify that they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements. They warrant, on behalf of themselves and their co-authors, that the content is original, has not been formally published, is not under consideration, and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights. They further warrant that the material contains no matter that is scandalous, obscene, libelous, or otherwise contrary to the law.
Corresponding authors will be given an opportunity to read and correct edited proofs, but if they fail to return such corrections by the date set by the editors, production and publication may proceed without the authors’ approval of the edited proofs.
