Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) and Traditional Knowledge in Brazil: An Ethnoentomological Analysis of Common Nomenclature
Abstract
Butterflies, in addition to their ecological relevance, play important symbolic and cultural roles in many societies. This study aimed to analyze the diversity of common names attributed to butterflies in Brazil, based on a systematic literature review (following the PRISMA method), including sources such as scientific articles, books, and field guides. A total of 189 scientific species names were recorded, belonging to five taxonomic families, and associated with 111 distinct common names. The family Nymphalidae presented the highest number of records, indicating a morphologically diverse and culturally recognized group. The common names were classified into interpretive categories, with morphological designations being the most common, followed by behavioral, ecological, and symbolic associations. The analysis shows that common names reflect local knowledge grounded in empirical observation and symbolic meaning, contributing significantly to ecological understanding and the appreciation of biodiversity. This study highlights the role of ethnoentomology as an interdisciplinary approach that values local knowledge and enhances the understanding of human-insect relationships, recommending its broader application in related research.
References
Alves, R. R. N., and W. M. S. Souto. 2011. Ethnozoology in Brazil: Current Status and Perspectives. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 7:1–18. DOI:10.1186/1746-4269-7-22.
Alves, A. C., A. dos A. Beims, E. de M. Alencar, F. A. de Lima, K. M. A. da Silva, E. S. de Sousa, and R. L. Cajaiba. 2019. Conhecimento Etnoentomológico dos Moradores do Município de Buriticupu, Maranhão, Brasil. Biotemas 32:97–105. DOI:10.5007/2175-7925.2019v32n2p97.
Apodonepa, L. A., and M. R. Barreto. 2015. Conhecimento Etnoentomológico na Comunidade Indígena Umutina (Mato Grosso, Brasil). Revista Etnobiología 13:68–79.
Balée, W. 1994. Footprints of the Forest: Ka’apor Ethnobotany—The Historical Ecology of Plant Utilization by an Amazonian People. Columbia University Press, New York.
Bates, H. W. 1862. Contributions to an Insect Fauna of the Amazon Valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidae. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 23:495–566. DOI:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1860.tb00146.x.
Beccaloni, G. W., Á. L. Viloria, S. K. Hall, and G. S. Robinson. 2008. Catalogue of the Hostplants of the Neotropical Butterflies. Natural History Museum, London.
Bentley, J. W., and G. Rodríguez. 2001. Honduran Folk Entomology. Current Anthropology 42:285–301.
Berlin, B. 1992. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Bowden, J. J., A. Owens, K. Brown, R. W. Harding, M. Graversen, M. Larrivée, K. McFarland, T. A. Miller, J. Warren, and J. O. Young. 2025. Moth Walls: Shedding Light on Moth Biodiversity. FACETS 10:1–6. DOI:10.1139/facets-2024-0298.
Braga, L. 2022. Borboletas do Legado das Águas, 1st edition. Reservas Votorantim, São Paulo, Brazil.
Brown, Jr., K. S. 1981. The Biology of Heliconius and Related Genera. Annual Review of Entomology 26:427–456.
Brown, Jr., K. S. 1992. Borboletas da Serra do Japi: Diversidade, Hábitats, Recursos Alimentares e Variação Temporal. In História Natural da Serra do Japi, edited by L. P. C. Morellato, pp. 142–186. Editora UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil.
Brown, Jr., K. S. 1996. Diversity of Brazilian Lepidoptera: History of Study, Methods for Measurement, and Use as Indicators for Genetic, Specific, and System Richness. In Biodiversity in Brazil: A First Approach, edited by C. E. M. Bicudo and N. A. Menezes, pp. 121–145. CNPq, Brasília, Brazil.
Cajaiba, R. L., and W. B. Silva. 2017. Aulas Práticas de Entomologia como Mecanismo Facilitador no Aprendizado de Taxonomia para Alunos do Ensino Médio. Scientia Amazonia 6:107–116.
Cardoso, M. O., A. M. S. R. Pamplona, and M. Michereff Filho. 2010. Recomendações Técnicas para o Controle de Lepidópteros-Praga em Couve e Repolho no Amazonas. Circular Técnica35:1–15. EMBRAPA, Manaus, Brazil.
Carlini, I. de O. 2022. Entomofagia: Insetos como Fonte Alimentar Humana: Uma Revisão Bibliográfica, pp. 1–42. UNESP. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/235877. Accessed on July 9, 2025.
Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil. 2025. Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil [Internet]. Brasília (DF): Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Available at: https://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/. Accessed on July 9, 2025.
Costa Neto, E. M. 2002a. The Ritual Use of Insects in Different Socio-Cultural Contexts. Sitientibus Série Ciências Biológicas 2:97–103. Available at: http://periodicos.uefs.br/index.php/sitientibusBiologia/article/view/8243. Accessed on July 9, 2025.
Costa Neto, E. M. 2002b. Etnotaxonomia: Bases Conceituais e Metodológicas. Revista Amazônica 4:111–126.
Costa Neto, E. M. 2004. Estudos Etnoentomológicos no Estado da Bahia, Brasil: Uma Homenagem aos 50 Anos do Campo de Pesquisa. Biotemas 17:117–149.
Costa Neto, E. M. 2005. Entomotherapy, or the Medicinal Use of Insects. Journal of Ethnobiology 25:93–114.
Costa Neto, E. M. 2013. Análise Etnossemântica de Nomes Comuns de Abelhas e Vespas (Insecta, Hymenoptera) na Terra Indígena Pankararé, Bahia, Brasil. Cadernos de Linguagem e Sociedade 14:237–251.
Costa Neto, E. M. 2022. O Bruxo-Azul e a Cobra-de-Asa: Insetos no Dia a Dia de uma Comunidade Rural do Recôncavo Baiano. Edufba, Salvador, Brazil.
Costa, M. F., and J. C. Soares. 2015. Livre como uma Borboleta: Simbologia e Cuidado Paliativo. Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia 18:1–11. Available at: https://www.scielo.br/j/rbgg/a/pY5XpWHG4SCfcL3p9fTb4FR/?lang=pt. Accessed on July 9, 2025.
DeVries, P. J. 1987. The Butterflies of Costa Rica and Their Natural History. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Freitas, A. V. L., and K. S. Brown, Jr. 2004. Phylogeny of the Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera). Systematic Biology 53:1–25.
Gilbert, L. E. 1972. Pollen Feeding and Reproductive Biology of Heliconius Butterflies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 69:1403–1407. DOI:10.1073/pnas.69.6.1403.
Godé, L., and C. E. B. Nobre. 2015. Inventário XIX da Reserva Biológica de Pedra Talhada: Borboletas e Mariposas (Lepidoptera). In Biodiversidade da Reserva Biológica de Pedra Talhada (Alagoas, Pernambuco – Brasil), edited by A. Studer, L. Nusbaumer, and R. Spichiger, Boissiera 68:683–692.
Hoshina, H. 2020. Cultural Lepidopterology in Modern Japan: Butterflies as Spiritual Insects in the Akihabara Culture. Journal of Geek Studies 7:149–159.
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio). 2023. Borboletas. Available at: https://www.gov.br/icmbio/pt-br/assuntos/centros-de-pesquisa/biodiversidade-do-cerrado/arquivo/avaliacao/borboletas. Accessed on July 9, 2025.
Lenko, K., and N. Papavero. 1996. Insetos no Folclore, 2nd edition. Plêiade/FAPESP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mallet, J. 2001. Mimicry: An Interface Between Psychology and Evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98:8928–8930. DOI:10.1073/pnas.171326298.
Mallet, J., and M. Joron. 1999. Evolution of Diversity in Warning Color and Mimicry: Polymorphisms, Shifting Balance, and Speciation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30:201–233. DOI:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30.1.201.
Melo, A. C. B., F. L. Lima-Araújo, J. E. Freire, and P. E. T. Braga. 2015. O Conhecimento Popular Acerca dos Insetos no Município de Cariré, Ceará, Brasil. Ciência e Natura 37:253–260.
Merckx, T., B. Huertas, Y. Basset, and J. Thomas. 2013. A Global Perspective on Conserving Butterflies and Moths and Their Habitats. In Key Topics in Conservation Biology 2, edited by D. W. Macdonald and K. J. Willis, pp. 237–257. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. DOI:10.1002/9781118520178.ch14.
Merrill, R. M., K. K. Dasmahapatra, J. W. Davey, D. D. Dell’Aglio, J. J. Hanly, B. Huber, C. D. Jiggins, M. Joron, K. M. Kozak, V. Llaurens, S. H. Martin, S. H. Montgomery, J. Morris, N. J. Nadeau, A. L. Pinharanda, N. Rosser, M. J. Thompson, S. Vanjari, R. W. R. Wallbank, and Q. Yu. 2015. The Diversification of Heliconius Butterflies: What Have We Learned in 150 years? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 28:1417–1438. DOI:10.1111/jeb.12672.
Mitter, C., D. R. Davis, and M. P. Cummings. 2017. Phylogeny and Evolution of Lepidoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 62:265–283. DOI:10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035125.
Monge-Nájera, J., and E. S. Hernández. 1991. A Morphological search for the Sound Mechanism of Hamadryas Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 30:82–90.
Müller, F. 1879. Ituna and Thyridia; a Remarkable Case of Mimicry in Butterflies. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of London 1879:xx–xxix.
Nomura, H. 2007. Entomologia Pitoresca II: Os Insetos nas Crenças, Superstições e Medicina Popular – Análise Bibliográfica. Sitientibus Série Ciências Biológicas 7:98–112.
Oliveira, I. F., and F. B. Baccaro. 2024. Borboletas Frugívoras da Resex Arapixi, 1st edition. Editora da Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Oliveira Neto, J. F. de. 2019. Borboletas do Litoral Sul: Limenitidinae, Heliconiinae e Biblidinae. UNESPAR – Campus Paranaguá, Paranaguá, Brazil.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., and Moher, D. 2021. The Prisma 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 372:n71. DOI:10.1136/bmj.n71.
Petiza, S., N. Hamada, A. C. Bruno, and E. M. Costa Neto. 2013. Etnotaxonomia Entomológica Baniwa na Cidade de São Gabriel da Cachoeira, Estado do Amazonas, Brasil. Revista de Antropologia 5:708–732.
Posey, D. A. 1986. Entomologia de Tribos Indígenas da Amazônia. In Suma Etnológica Brasileira, vol. 1, edited by D. Ribeiro, pp. 251–272. Vozes/Finep, Petrópolis, Brazil.
Posey, D. A. 1987. Temas e Inquirições em Etnoentomologia: Algumas Sugestões Quanto à Geração de Hipóteses. Boletim Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi 3:99–134.
Rosa, A. H. B., and A. V. L. Freitas. 2020. Guia básico das borboletas asas de vidro da Mata Atlântica. 1st edition, maio de 2020. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.18562.30407/1. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341106786_Guia_basico_das_borboletas_asas_de_vidro_da_Mata_Atlantica. Accessed on September 17, 2025.
Rosa, A. H. B., and A. V. L. Freitas. 2024. The Importance of Protected Areas for Threatened Brazilian Butterflies. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 96:e20231344. DOI:10.1590/0001-3765202420231344.
Rosa, A. H. B., B. Huertas, K. R. Willmott, E. P. Barbosa, P. A. Machado, O. H. H. Mielke, C. H. P. Canaan, and A. V. L. Freitas. 2021. Fifty Years without a Name: A New Species of Splendeuptychia Forster (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae). Zootaxa 5061:95–114. DOI:10.11646/zootaxa.5061.1.4.
Salgado-Neto, G. 2010. Lepidópteros do Brasil (Agenda de Campo). Rede de Inovação Tecnológica para Defesa Agropecuária, Viçosa, Brazil.
Santos, J. R. L., S. E. O. Thomas, A. Dorval, and M. C. Pasa. 2015. A Etnoentomologia na Comunidade Mata Cavalo de Baixo em Nossa Senhora do Livramento, MT, Brasil. Biodiversidade 14:84–92.
Santos, J. R. dos, F. J. S. Vieira, A. S. Oliveira, and F. P. Soares. 2022. Borboletas no Nordeste: As Borboletas em Áreas Protegidas de Florestas Nordestinas. Self-published.
Tyler, H. A., K. S. Brown, Jr., and K. H. Wilson. 1994. Swallowtail Butterflies of the Americas. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, FL.
Uehara-Prado, M., and D. B. Ribeiro. 2012. Serra do Itapeti: Aspectos Históricos, Sociais e Mutualísticos. In Borboletas em Floresta Atlântica: Métodos de Amostragem e Inventário de Espécies na Serra do Itapeti, vol. 1, pp. 167–186. Editora da Universidade de Mogi das Cruzes, Mogi das Cruzes, Brazil.
Ulysséa, M. A., N. Hanazaki, and B. C. Lopes. 2010. Percepção e Uso dos Insetos pelos Moradores da Comunidade de Ribeirão da Ilha, Santa Catarina, Brasil. Biotemas 23:1191–1202.
Vieira, R. S., C. Motta, and D. B. Agra. 2010. Observando Borboletas: Uma Experiência para Monitoramento de Fauna em Unidades de Conservação. Editora INPA, Manaus, Brazil.
Wijnen, B., H. L. Leertouwer, and D. G. Stavenga. 2007. Colors and Pterin Pigmentation of Pierid Butterfly Wings. Journal of Insect Physiology 53:1206–1217. DOI:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2007.06.016.
Yack, J. E., L. D. Otero, J. W. Dawson, A. Surlykke, and J. H. Fullard. 2001. Sound Production and Hearing in the Blue Cracker Butterfly Hamadryas feronia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Journal of Experimental Biology 204:3689–3702. DOI:10.1242/jeb.203.24.3689.
Young, A. M. 1972. Community Ecology of Some Tropical Rain Forest Butterflies. American Midland Naturalist 87:146. DOI:10.2307/2423888.
Zacca, T., M. M. Casagrande, O. H. H. Mielke, B. Huertas, A. V. L. Freitas, M. A. Marín, M. Espeland, and K. R. Willmott. 2021. A New Euptychiine Butterfly Species from South Brazil and Taxonomic Rearrangements for Taydebis Freitas, 2013 and Hermeuptychia Forster, 1964 (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae). Zootaxa 5023:555–570. DOI:10.11646/zootaxa.5023.4.5. PMID:34810948.
Copyright (c) 2026 Caique Dantas, Eraldo Medeiros Costa Neto, Elmo Borges de Azevedo Koch
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content and grant Ethnobiology Letters (the “Journal”) and the Society of Ethnobiology right of first publication. Authors and the Journal agree that Ethnobiology Letters will publish the article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to use, distribute, and reproduce the work non-commercially, provided the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
For any reuse or redistribution of a work, users must make clear the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
In publishing with Ethnobiology Letters corresponding authors certify that they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements. They warrant, on behalf of themselves and their co-authors, that the content is original, has not been formally published, is not under consideration, and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights. They further warrant that the material contains no matter that is scandalous, obscene, libelous, or otherwise contrary to the law.
Corresponding authors will be given an opportunity to read and correct edited proofs, but if they fail to return such corrections by the date set by the editors, production and publication may proceed without the authors’ approval of the edited proofs.
